http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/93854. There is further read on this at provided link.U.S. Sen. Jon Kyl plans to introduce an immigration enforcement bill before the Senate’s month-long summer recess starts on Aug. 4. The Arizona Republican’s new tactic will be more narrowly focused than the Senate’s previous and unsuccessful approach that tried to link immigration enforcement to immigration reform. The broader measure collapsed in June. The new legislation will offer a selection of immigration enforcement options that were identified during and after debate surrounding the failed immigration reform bill, Kyl said. “It will be kind of a menu of all the kinds of things you can pick from if you wanted to do enforcement first. I think we need to change some laws in that regard,â€� Kyl said Monday during an interview on radio station KTAR-FM 92.3. Kyl did not elaborate on his p lans during the interview. Later, through a spokesman, he declined an interview with the Tribune because the language of the new bill has yet to be finalized. Kyl was one of the chief architects of the previous immigration reform bill, which included several border and interior enforcement provisions. Among them: new border fencing, vehicle barriers, ground-based radar and camera towers, more U.S. Border Patrol agents, an employment eligibility verification system, and criminal and civil penalties for employers who hire illegal immigrants. It was unclear Tuesday whether Kyl plans to recycle any of those provisions in his new bill. Most of the controversy surrounding the failed bill centered on its other features, including a system to provide millions of illegal immigrants already living in the United States legal status and eventual citizenship, and a guest worker program for foreign nationals to work in the United States legally. Kyl was roundly criticized by fellow Republicans for supporting the previous bill. They said it offered “amnestyâ€� to illegal immigrants. In June, Kyl argued that it wasn’t amnesty, because it required illegal immigrants to undergo background checks, pay fines, learn English and fulfill other requirements. Kyl told KTAR he didn’t regret his position on the failed immigration reform bill. “I regret not doing a better job explaining what we thought we had accomplished that made the bill acceptable from my point of view,â€� he said. “Obviously, there were parts of it that I didn’t like. I thought I was getting some pretty good concessions from the other side. And by the way, they had some objections from their side, as well.â€� Guiding an immigration enforcement bill through the Senate undoubtedly will present new challenges, because unlike the previous bill, it likely will lack provisions attractive to some liberal members of Congress. Immigration enforcement and reform measures have two basic trade-offs, Kyl said. “One side wants to go easy on the enforcement and provide regularization to all of the people who are here; the other side wants to be really tough on enforcement and not provide for the regularization,â€� he said. ElÃ*as Bermúdez, leader of the activist group Immigrants Without Borders, said an enforcement bill will be ill-fated. “I don’t think it will pass. I don’t think they’ll find a single Democrat who will go for enforcement only – and they are going to need the Democrats,â€� he said. Arizona Republican Party chairman Randy Pullen, who opposed the previous reform legislation, said the concept appears promising. “Clearly, enforcement related bills would be much better received by the party in general, not only in Arizona, but nationally,â€� he said.I guess Kyl thinks he can’t dig his political grave any deeper. We’ll see the next time he is up for reelection.Kyl lied about being in favor of enforcement first to get re-elected last year.Kyl was one of only a few Republicans to still vote to go down in flames with the last amnesty bill, when the rest of the rats jumped ship as they saw it was dead.Kyl hasn’t earned the benefit of the doubt. He’s a liar, he betrayed everyone that voted for him on this issue, and in the span of a few weeks it is very unlikely he has seen the error of his ways.As I said, even IF this bill was a “goodâ€� bill I wouldn’t trust it to be anything other than a decoy just so they can get it to the floor and “fix itâ€� with amnesty provisions.Kyl is NO ally to Americans on this issue.billc4u he sure does . How big do you think his bribe was ?

Kyl sounds as if he is on the rolls of La Raza and other groups that want to have illegals given rights not earned due to being illegal so if we are viligant we shall overcome this to as you are correct it will involve something that involves amnesty for the ones that should be deported now under the laws already on the books

Mr. Kyl is not saying who he is working for. I bet that is not for the American citizens, then who is he working for. I think he should answer this question first before he start talking about anything that have to do with illegal immigration. I also think that if the laws that we have now are not being enforce, what guarantee us that once the amnesty bill is pass that the laws that will protect the US citizens and our borders are going to be enforce. Where and what money are they going to use in order to do the back ground check that he so proudly talked about. What about the billions and billions of dollars that are need it in order to accommodate over 12 + millions of illegal immigrants and the families that they are going to bring later on. Let him answer all of our questions and then maybe we could talk about amnesty.

I would have to read it, word for word.I read what the press SAID the Senate Bill would have done, but I also read the bill, and they didn't match.